Published September 30, 2026 · Closing Note research
The same trades can make or lose money depending on how much goes into each one. Below, every stock from the swing scan, and separately the top-ranked candidates from it, are bought at the close and sold at the first close above their 5-day average or on day 5. You set the money.
Templates:
Account & size
Risk & costs
Ending value
Return
Worst drop
Avg position
Trades / won
Avg trade
Capital in use
Margin interest
Skipped signals
Top-ranked candidates
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
All candidates
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
S&P 500 (SPY)
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
▬ top-ranked candidates
▬ all candidates
- - SPY · Loading the
data…
Simulated at closing
prices and marked to market daily. The top-ranked candidates are a
model record, and the ranking behind them was developed on this same
period, which flatters them. This is one stretch of one market; it says
nothing certain about the next one.
Before you draw conclusions
2026 has been a good year for this kind of trading, and in a good year
the aggressive settings look like free money: fewer, bigger positions,
leverage, adding to stocks that keep falling. In weak years, such as 2011,
2018 and 2022 for dip buying, the same settings mostly made the losses
deeper. So use the sandbox to see the trade-off between return and worst
drop, not to find the setting with the biggest number. The sections below
go through the controls in order. The trading rules step by step, when
to buy and when to sell a gap up are on
how to trade the strategy.
Positions
The number of positions decides how much one bad trade, or one bad week,
can hurt. With equal sizes it also sets the size of each trade: 15
positions means 6.7% of the account per trade, 5 positions means 20%.
With few positions, a handful of stocks that keep falling decide the
result, and luck plays a big part: which signals happened to arrive while
a position was free. More positions make the ride smoother. Past 10 to 20
positions, more mostly means smaller trades and more cash waiting.
Try it: set Positions to 5 and hover over the return to see the range across runs.
Size per trade
The sizing modes decide what happens on days with fewer signals than free
positions. Fixed size gives every trade the same share of the account
and leaves the rest in cash. Fill free positions spreads the money
meant for the free positions over the trades that came in, so quiet days
get fewer, bigger trades. Deploy all capital spreads all spare buying
power over the day's trades. Max per trade caps any single trade in
the last two modes, so a day with one signal cannot put the whole account
into one stock.
How big is too big? The Kelly criterion gives the share of capital to
bet when you know your odds: the win rate minus the loss rate divided by
the win/loss ratio (Kelly 1956). For dip trades it comes out far higher than most
traders would bet, because it assumes independent bets one at a time,
while dip trades fall together in a sell-off. Traders who use it usually
bet half of the Kelly amount or less (Thorp 2011).
Try it: switch Sizing to Deploy all and compare the worst drop and capital in use.
Leverage and drawdowns
Leverage lets open positions add up to more than the account. The
difference is borrowed and charged margin interest. It scales the
gains and the losses alike, so the worst drop grows with it.
The worst drop matters more than the return, because losses and
recoveries are not symmetric: a 20% drop needs a 25% gain to get back to
even, a 50% drop needs 100%, and a 60% drop needs 150%.
Try it: load the All in, 2x template and look at the worst drop.
Repeat signals
A falling stock often signals two or three days in a row. Repeat
signal decides whether you add another position each time, add half of
one, or skip it. Adding is averaging down: it makes the most when the stock
bounces and loses the most when it does not, because more money sits in
stocks that are still falling. Each addition uses a position, so the total
stays within the account.
Try it: set Repeat signal to Skip and watch Skipped signals and Capital in use.
Crowded days
On some days dozens of stocks signal at once. That is usually one broad
sell-off, not dozens of separate chances. Crowd scaling makes each
trade smaller on those days: at 1, ten signals get a tenth of the normal
size each. It makes the worst days less painful, mostly by putting less
money to work, so expect a lower return along with the smaller drops.
Try it: set Crowd scaling to 0.5 and compare Capital in use.
Get the daily alert
Every trading day at 15:45 ET (21:45 CET), before the U.S. close: the full
candidate list, ranked, with the top-ranked names marked and exits flagged
for open trades.
Free during the open beta. One click to unsubscribe.
Questions
How much should I risk per trade?
A common rule of thumb is to lose no more than about 1% of the account if a trade goes wrong. For a strategy without a fixed stop, such as the RSI(2) dip rule, it is simpler to split the account into equal positions and choose a number of positions you can live with in a bad month.
How many positions should a swing trader hold?
Enough that no single trade decides the month. With a handful of positions, a few stocks that keep falling can decide the whole year; spreading over 10 to 20 positions makes the swings much smaller.
What is maximum drawdown?
The largest fall of an account from a peak to a later low, in percent. It matters because losses need larger gains to recover: a 50% drawdown needs a 100% gain to get back to even.
Should I average down on a losing position?
It depends on the strategy. For a dip-buying rule, a second signal on a stock you already hold is a new setup, and adding to it can raise returns. It also deepens the losses when the stock keeps falling, because more money ends up in it.
What is the Kelly criterion?
A formula for the share of capital to bet when you know your odds: win rate minus loss rate divided by the win/loss ratio. It assumes independent bets. Trades that fall together in a sell-off are not independent, so traders who use it usually bet a fraction of it.
References
Kelly, J. L. (1956). A New Interpretation of Information Rate. Bell System Technical Journal 35(4), 917–926. doi:10.1002/j.1538-7305.1956.tb03809.x Origin of the Kelly criterion for sizing repeated bets.
Thorp, E. O. (2011). The Kelly Criterion in Blackjack, Sports Betting, and the Stock Market. In The Kelly Capital Growth Investment Criterion, World Scientific, 789–832. doi:10.1142/9789814293501_0054 Kelly in practice, and why fractional Kelly is used.